Posts by Monarke

    Well about that acc part was really my doubt , so 1st attack & crit and then acc ( but do u think with acc collection is enough ) ?

    You dont need accuracy on gear at all to have enough, if u got few accuracy collections from transformations, accuracy doesnt increase your dmg on boss, it just helps you to not miss/dodge/resist your skills, right now Tarukan is the only boss u need accuracy for but with regular 0 accuracy on gear, acceso and wings on accuracy while feather and bracelet without, u should get around 16k-17k accuracy more than enough for anything :):P

    This is for painters and mages ? mate

    I never care about accuracy. What you have from your gear should suffice. I don't even use accuracy manastones. In my opinion, what to look for is magic / psyhical attack and crit. For DMG.

    In my case for tarukan is not enough and if u need for tarukan u need for all mobs / bosses etc etc .

    What im trying to understand is if its connected with physical / magical attack.

    Being direct : + acc = + damage ( since u got more chance to land ur attacks ) . this is applicated for all mobs / bosses ?

    Hello all,

    I have a doubt here about the accuracy and magical accuracy stats.

    As a painter ( without all transformations collections ) I have 16.700acc and when I was trying to get more dps and speaking with some friends, they got some collections ( magical accuracy ) and rank s minion ( ma ) , so they got more ma and studying some prigga runs with ultimate they got more damage.

    Well the question is ( and i hope that is not a dumb question ) : Is it worth it to raise accuracy or magical accuracy ? Whats the relation between acc , physical attack, crit strike ( and from mage class to )

    When i say raise it its like same as manastones ( crit , phys , etc etc ). I know that for Tarukan u need like 19k acc but I think its the only one.

    Thank you

    and my doubt still remains is this rune because by looking at it , it sounds that it doesnt affect the selected target , can you confirm that ?

    The Attack incerase isn't as good as many people think it is i had mine on +5 and it barely even made a difference regarding my damage output. I had an incerase of like 150 - 500 more dmg with skills (consider it depends on how much base dmg your skills have). However i only tested this in PvP and it's almost useless there i would rather pick additional damage and area of effect + an amplification / support rune. If your question only refers to PvE go for attack incerase, additional dmg, area of effect

    I will not change the support rune because the crit strike reduc its very good at pve and pvp so basically :

    PVE : attack power + add dmg + crit strik / spell reduc
    PVP : add dmg + area of effect + crit strik / spell reduc

    its a nice combo like this ?

    In PvE you'd go for all sorts of atk runes, but I think that those additional damage runes are not as rewarding for painter in comparison to some other classes who deal more (initial) hits. Personally I use attack power, additional damage and area effect, but so far I think the first one is the most important one. :/

    I made some dps metter tests and attack power rune is better than area of dmg but area of dmg is good when u have a lot of mobs / ely

    Hello all,


    For Painter i m trying to make some tests at runes : attack power or area damage , what do you think? Which one is better for dps / painter


    Regards :)

    they spawn from bluepillers in gelk. they spawn random but people is fast kill them so hard see any.


    you need kill 1 elite mob that is not so hard solo but can take some time to kill

    Yeah i saw one today, but it wasnt a bluepiller, it was like a orange stone, i opened and lurker did appear, now im at prahma dredgion part have to kill 10 mobs from there, but people kill driller to fast that i cant kill mobs xD