Ok made a cpl more chars and they are in english !! but when play Revenant it is'nt ? is rev not avail in English ? bit confusing ...
Gameforge doesnt do new voice acting for Aion classic, so only the old content is voiced in English. All new patches from Korea with new content will be with korean voice.
I just only just tried to open 2 Clients to login to 2 accounts on one PC I knew you use to be able to do on old client but seems can only run one game is there a way to be able to do this any help with be great.
//Do not post a guide to bypass the one-client rule - Sparx
Display MoreStop listening to the community.
Last time you've listened to the community we had to put up with a 1.9 frankenpatch for months and we are still suffering from the consequences (like having to wait for the new, good and interesting content starting with 2.7)
If you want proper community feedback and base decisions on it, use the ingame survey feature. STOP, for the love of god STOP forwarding the feedback of forum crybabies exclusively.
Whatever feedback you're forwarding and working with got us to this exact point and is therefore worthless. It's not helping to build a better game, it's f#cking it up.
Use the features you have. There are systems in place and you have used them before.
STOP.
FORWARDING.
FORUM.
FEEDBACK.
USE.
PROPER.
FEEDBACK.
SYSTEMS.
The community wanted the REAL 1,9.
That we got Frankenstein 1,9 was in no way the fault of the community.
As the title say, I wanna say it's truly dissapointing to see that a daeva pass is 25 euros, and the rewards are so lame... i mean you get some noobish enchant stones, half of them are around 50 lvls, and half above 60 lvl..and the other rewards are candies, and some pots/ revive stone/ Dyes... useless stuff overall...I don't get it why everyone isn't saying a thing about this
Dont buy it if u dont think its worth it...
don't forget chanter pls
You literally released a BP that is significantly worse than the first one. You are supposed to reward greatly the players that additionally support you and show them that their loyalty is rewarded and valued.
Really disappointed.
Have you tried not buying it?
Display MoreHello,
Has anyone had issues with sieges freezing and managed to fix it?
Issue:
Game works perfectly anywhere (sanctum, pvp, reshanta, instances), but the moment I get near to the gate of a fort (with tons of people attacking it), the game freezes and screen turns white. Then I close the game and log back in, tons of people waiting in the dux room, game works perfectly with tons of ppl inside. The moment the commander spawns -> freeze. Close game, log in, fly back to fort -> when in range: Freeze.
Happens on max settings, happens on lowest settings, happens on full screen or windowed, happens when im on discc+YT, happens when literally everything is closed besides Aion.
Internet connection is very stable gigabit, PC is juiced to the max (rtx 4090 etc), next to germany, drivers/os updated, making sure that my gpu is being used and not some integrated, etc etc.. Repaired, reinstalled, tried other SSD, ...
I don't mind lag, i understand its an old game and that people DC once in a while, but i get DC'd the moment I get near siege.. EVERY TIME, so that's obv not what majority of people experience.
Turn of animations for all in graphic settings, thats a bit problem for fps, make it solo or group.
So it seems we have loot from open world mobs, but they seem extremely poor compared to retail, this is a screenshot I took in NA back in 2010 or 2011 or something, going level 1 to 9 in Poeta and bags were full already at 7
No idea how nerfed it is in our patch, but maybe an unpopular opinion, the amount of loot from 1-9 shown in your picture is way too much imo.
I really don't understand how a free to play game ends up being more expensive than when it was subscription based 14 years ago... And 30euros per month is really expensive, it's almost what I pay per month for spotify, netflix and the xbox gamepass all together...
Because when the game was p2p 11 years ago we had a lot more players.
So when GF goes to a p2p model now, they have to earn more money per player to make up for the lesser amount of income. To do this they need additional income from other means like a battlepass.
If we would only have a monthly subscription and nothing more, than i doubt GF would even have launched it, wouldn't have earned enough money.
It is a good thing for the game? No, but it's unfortunately the best we're gonna get.
the game gona die very fast whith 2x realese everything its easy leveling its easy questing is easy makes rewards u get feel empty in classic thrill of getting blue wep upgrade or kromede was amazing in 2x nothing matters except lvl 55 90 % of content is useless pve gives pvp rewards no need to pvp no need to run around maps rifting just stay in gelk and inggison zergin back and foward only 1x content will be s rank dark poeta that being done at lvl 55 is not even a challange anymore i dont know why they tryng to push gameforge to realese 2x both in kr and NA playerbase is 80 % lower after 2x in both classic clients zones also on retail back in 2009 1.5 to 1.9 had most amount of players after 2x everyone left game went free to play by 2.7 cuz not enogh subs and somehow people are under impression that 2.7 was peak of aion if only u saw 37 packed servers during 1.9 compared to like 8 eu server u would think otherwise
I agree on everything, but as far as i remember we didnt get close to 37 servers. Might be wrong though.
don't just judge that on the patch though, there was a huge outcry against the candies with classic being called majorly p2w and a quick cash milking.
NA had sub 20% server capacity on Siel during prime times, 4 weeks post release. Surely the delayed 1.5 was the problem. But I am just repeating
Imagine if EU players never went to NA, KEKW.
The first week everyone had free siels aura. After it went down the hill.
Also for me it just looks like Aion Classic was a release to pump up the already low earnings of Aion (even in Asia..), while they finish releasing their new games like Thrones and Liberty and other projects they have.
So again its just another cash grab, that will likely have no future. But even like that i would like to give it a try. But no way im paying a sub fee for this, its just stupid.
Funny thing is though, Aion is making Ncsoft more money now per quarter than it did from 2015 till 2021. During 2015 they were still putting in a lot of effort for Aion, so they might do so again. So even if GF might see it as a cashgrab, as long as Ncsoft keeps developing Aion, we will get the content atleast.
Display More
Some players love & crave those niche aspects that, while not being perfect, make Aion stand out compared to the rest of the games in the MMORPG genre, above all the supremely superior combat gameplay (the best "classic TAB target type" combat in an MMO, even to this day), the faction open world PvP, and the community interactions happening on a daily basis, fueling excitement.
I am one of these players.
To us, Aion is an S Tier MMORPG that has been increasingly ruined by multiple factors throughout the last 9 years or so, and an official Classic server bringing together as many English speaking players as possible nowadays is as close as it gets to what we seek.
I wouldnt doubt that Aion could have been an S tier MMORPG. If it had better performing in FPS, if it didnt had P2W, if it focused more on other stuff than just grinding gear and repeating the same stuff for 1 year in a row (skin hunting, titles, competitive pvp, ranks, open world adventures etc). Every major patch is just doing the same but with different names and stats on items. The quality of PvE/PvP content, encounters... If they banned hackers... and many other stuff.
Sadly noone of that ever happened, rather the opposite, it got worst with the years. So yes indeed, Aion has more things that make you get away than play it, thats why its a D tier MMO that dont ever gets a mention in a list of the 25 best MMORPGS to play in the last 10 years.
So why are u still here if in your opinion Aion is a D tier mmo? Maybe the game isn't for you, move on.
Display More
Display MoreIf you actually liked aion you would play it regardless of 1.x or 2.x but instead all of you just want to stroke your nostalgia without caring about the future of the game
With that logic Aion retail wouldn't be dead by now.
By aion I meant the versions where the Classic tag would apply. We don't speak about retail because that's a massive mess and is no longer "Aion" imo.
Imagine that 10.000 people would play a 1,9 release, but only 5.000 if the game launches with 2.0. It would be better for the longevity for aion classic to first launch with 1,9 and than try to regain as many people for 2,0 and beyond.
It's pretty obvious at this point that the initial playerbase will be higher with a 1,x than a 2,0 release seeing all the comments and polls made by players. The real question is, how long would we run 1,x content? If we have 1 year of 1,x, than yes it would be bad for the game. However 3 months or so of 1,9 before the 2.0 release would I think be perfect.
The key in making classic succesful is to launch it with the version that pulls in the maximum amount of people and to then keep them around with additional content/patches. 2.0 isn't that version.
I do agree that 1,2 or 1,5 would not be a good option, since than it would take way too long to get to 2.0. which would probably lead to a lot of people quitting beforehand.
IMO the monetization is more important than the patch. NA's slow patch release would have been more tolerable if we didn't have the battle pass and candies sky rocketing everybody's progression
Well yea the monetization can screw things up as well, but one does not exclude the other though.
Display MoreDisplay MoreIts because sub fee in a trash game like aion = dead. I spent 150 euros last year in expansions and stuff in GW2 for years and years of guaranteed content without P2W, but Aion? no thanks. And second cos the patch 1.2 is not as good as u wanna sell it.
So u are trying to represent the Aion community with your opinion, but u say Aion is a trash game. Why don't u move along back to Guildwars 2 and not try to ruin the classic launch for the players who actually like aion.
Gameforge might mistake your opinion for the wider range of Aion fans, while clearly u aren't.
If you actually liked aion you would play it regardless of 1.x or 2.x but instead all of you just want to stroke your nostalgia without caring about the future of the game
With that logic Aion retail wouldn't be dead by now.
By aion I meant the versions where the Classic tag would apply. We don't speak about retail because that's a massive mess and is no longer "Aion" imo.
Imagine that 10.000 people would play a 1,9 release, but only 5.000 if the game launches with 2.0. It would be better for the longevity for aion classic to first launch with 1,9 and than try to regain as many people for 2,0 and beyond.
It's pretty obvious at this point that the initial playerbase will be higher with a 1,x than a 2,0 release seeing all the comments and polls made by players. The real question is, how long would we run 1,x content? If we have 1 year of 1,x, than yes it would be bad for the game. However 3 months or so of 1,9 before the 2.0 release would I think be perfect.
The key in making classic succesful is to launch it with the version that pulls in the maximum amount of people and to then keep them around with additional content/patches. 2.0 isn't that version.
I do agree that 1,2 or 1,5 would not be a good option, since than it would take way too long to get to 2.0. which would probably lead to a lot of people quitting beforehand.
Its because sub fee in a trash game like aion = dead. I spent 150 euros last year in expansions and stuff in GW2 for years and years of guaranteed content without P2W, but Aion? no thanks. And second cos the patch 1.2 is not as good as u wanna sell it.
So u are trying to represent the Aion community with your opinion, but u say Aion is a trash game. Why don't u move along back to Guildwars 2 and not try to ruin the classic launch for the players who actually like aion.
Gameforge might mistake your opinion for the wider range of Aion fans, while clearly u aren't.
If you actually liked aion you would play it regardless of 1.x or 2.x but instead all of you just want to stroke your nostalgia without caring about the future of the game
With that logic Aion retail wouldn't be dead by now.
Its because sub fee in a trash game like aion = dead. I spent 150 euros last year in expansions and stuff in GW2 for years and years of guaranteed content without P2W, but Aion? no thanks. And second cos the patch 1.2 is not as good as u wanna sell it.
So u are trying to represent the Aion community with your opinion, but u say Aion is a trash game. Why don't u move along back to Guildwars 2 and not try to ruin the classic launch for the players who actually like aion.
Gameforge might mistake your opinion for the wider range of Aion fans, while clearly u aren't.
i usually troll around a bit with my answers, but im gonna be honest now.
i dont mind 2.0, i think in the end i will enjoy the patch 2.x more than 1.x.
BUT i want to play 1.x before 2.0 because we will get to 2.0 anyway.
i especially dont want to rush to 3.0. i dont care a bit about the executor class and what ncsoft is doing with current classic on korea. they gonna fu ck up the experience and nostalgia for everyone with any new changes.
But the whole premise of Classic is that they will listen to what the players want and so far they did a pretty good job
But Gameforge unfortunately doesn't if they launch with 2.0
