Posts by Zergie

    Ok made a cpl more chars and they are in english !! but when play Revenant it is'nt ? is rev not avail in English ? bit confusing ...

    Gameforge doesnt do new voice acting for Aion classic, so only the old content is voiced in English. All new patches from Korea with new content will be with korean voice.

    I just only just tried to open 2 Clients to login to 2 accounts on one PC I knew you use to be able to do on old client but seems can only run one game is there a way to be able to do this any help with be great.

    :censored:


    //Do not post a guide to bypass the one-client rule - Sparx

    The community wanted the REAL 1,9.

    That we got Frankenstein 1,9 was in no way the fault of the community.

    As the title say, I wanna say it's truly dissapointing to see that a daeva pass is 25 euros, and the rewards are so lame... i mean you get some noobish enchant stones, half of them are around 50 lvls, and half above 60 lvl..and the other rewards are candies, and some pots/ revive stone/ Dyes... useless stuff overall...I don't get it why everyone isn't saying a thing about this X(

    Dont buy it if u dont think its worth it...

    Turn of animations for all in graphic settings, thats a bit problem for fps, make it solo or group.

    So it seems we have loot from open world mobs, but they seem extremely poor compared to retail, this is a screenshot I took in NA back in 2010 or 2011 or something, going level 1 to 9 in Poeta and bags were full already at 7


    FR2O1ik.png

    No idea how nerfed it is in our patch, but maybe an unpopular opinion, the amount of loot from 1-9 shown in your picture is way too much imo.

    I really don't understand how a free to play game ends up being more expensive than when it was subscription based 14 years ago... And 30euros per month is really expensive, it's almost what I pay per month for spotify, netflix and the xbox gamepass all together...

    Because when the game was p2p 11 years ago we had a lot more players.


    So when GF goes to a p2p model now, they have to earn more money per player to make up for the lesser amount of income. To do this they need additional income from other means like a battlepass.

    If we would only have a monthly subscription and nothing more, than i doubt GF would even have launched it, wouldn't have earned enough money.


    It is a good thing for the game? No, but it's unfortunately the best we're gonna get.

    the game gona die very fast whith 2x realese everything its easy leveling its easy questing is easy makes rewards u get feel empty in classic thrill of getting blue wep upgrade or kromede was amazing in 2x nothing matters except lvl 55 90 % of content is useless pve gives pvp rewards no need to pvp no need to run around maps rifting just stay in gelk and inggison zergin back and foward only 1x content will be s rank dark poeta that being done at lvl 55 is not even a challange anymore i dont know why they tryng to push gameforge to realese 2x both in kr and NA playerbase is 80 % lower after 2x in both classic clients zones also on retail back in 2009 1.5 to 1.9 had most amount of players after 2x everyone left game went free to play by 2.7 cuz not enogh subs and somehow people are under impression that 2.7 was peak of aion if only u saw 37 packed servers during 1.9 compared to like 8 eu server u would think otherwise

    I agree on everything, but as far as i remember we didnt get close to 37 servers. Might be wrong though.

    NA had sub 20% server capacity on Siel during prime times, 4 weeks post release. Surely the delayed 1.5 was the problem. But I am just repeating


    Imagine if EU players never went to NA, KEKW.

    The first week everyone had free siels aura. After it went down the hill.

    Also for me it just looks like Aion Classic was a release to pump up the already low earnings of Aion (even in Asia..), while they finish releasing their new games like Thrones and Liberty and other projects they have.


    So again its just another cash grab, that will likely have no future. But even like that i would like to give it a try. But no way im paying a sub fee for this, its just stupid.

    Funny thing is though, Aion is making Ncsoft more money now per quarter than it did from 2015 till 2021. During 2015 they were still putting in a lot of effort for Aion, so they might do so again. So even if GF might see it as a cashgrab, as long as Ncsoft keeps developing Aion, we will get the content atleast.

    So why are u still here if in your opinion Aion is a D tier mmo? Maybe the game isn't for you, move on.

    Well yea the monetization can screw things up as well, but one does not exclude the other though.

    Imagine that 10.000 people would play a 1,9 release, but only 5.000 if the game launches with 2.0. It would be better for the longevity for aion classic to first launch with 1,9 and than try to regain as many people for 2,0 and beyond.


    It's pretty obvious at this point that the initial playerbase will be higher with a 1,x than a 2,0 release seeing all the comments and polls made by players. The real question is, how long would we run 1,x content? If we have 1 year of 1,x, than yes it would be bad for the game. However 3 months or so of 1,9 before the 2.0 release would I think be perfect.


    The key in making classic succesful is to launch it with the version that pulls in the maximum amount of people and to then keep them around with additional content/patches. 2.0 isn't that version.


    I do agree that 1,2 or 1,5 would not be a good option, since than it would take way too long to get to 2.0. which would probably lead to a lot of people quitting beforehand.

    Its because sub fee in a trash game like aion = dead. I spent 150 euros last year in expansions and stuff in GW2 for years and years of guaranteed content without P2W, but Aion? no thanks. And second cos the patch 1.2 is not as good as u wanna sell it.

    So u are trying to represent the Aion community with your opinion, but u say Aion is a trash game. Why don't u move along back to Guildwars 2 and not try to ruin the classic launch for the players who actually like aion.


    Gameforge might mistake your opinion for the wider range of Aion fans, while clearly u aren't.

    If you actually liked aion you would play it regardless of 1.x or 2.x but instead all of you just want to stroke your nostalgia without caring about the future of the game

    With that logic Aion retail wouldn't be dead by now.

    Its because sub fee in a trash game like aion = dead. I spent 150 euros last year in expansions and stuff in GW2 for years and years of guaranteed content without P2W, but Aion? no thanks. And second cos the patch 1.2 is not as good as u wanna sell it.

    So u are trying to represent the Aion community with your opinion, but u say Aion is a trash game. Why don't u move along back to Guildwars 2 and not try to ruin the classic launch for the players who actually like aion.


    Gameforge might mistake your opinion for the wider range of Aion fans, while clearly u aren't.

    i usually troll around a bit with my answers, but im gonna be honest now.

    i dont mind 2.0, i think in the end i will enjoy the patch 2.x more than 1.x.

    BUT i want to play 1.x before 2.0 because we will get to 2.0 anyway.

    i especially dont want to rush to 3.0. i dont care a bit about the executor class and what ncsoft is doing with current classic on korea. they gonna fu ck up the experience and nostalgia for everyone with any new changes.

    But the whole premise of Classic is that they will listen to what the players want and so far they did a pretty good job

    But Gameforge unfortunately doesn't if they launch with 2.0